jerdog · Jul 19, 2012 at 09:00 am

Jelly Bean Implements Higher Level of Security

A lot of hullabaloo has been made about the security of today’s mobile OS’s, and for good reason. BlackBerry for the longest time was considered to be the most secure, and was the smartphone of choice for the U.S. Government. This has changed in the last year, with the NSA even releasing it’s own white paper on an Enterprise Mobility Architecture focusing on securing Android 2.2.

Any OS tends to suffer from a single point of failure—the user. Sure you can lock down your device with a password, but the responsibility to have a strong password lies at the feet of the user, not the OS.

Android 4.0 implemented a feature widely used in desktop computing as far back as Windows XP called Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), which effectively rearranges the positions of key data in memory address space. This feature dramatically reduces the ability of a hacker to predict target memory address areas and seek out exploits. Security researcher Jon Oberheide had this to say about the challenges of implementing ASLR:

ASLR is commonly an all-or-nothing proposition. If ASLR is not applied to all areas of memory in a process, its effectiveness is often nullified. A single executable mapping that is mapped in a static location in the address space is often sufficient to construct a ROP payload.

He then went on to comment on the implementation of ASLR in Android 4.0:

Unfortunately, the ASLR support in Android 4.0 did not live up to expectations and is largely ineffective for mitigating real-world attacks, due to the lack of randomization of the executable and linker memory regions.

But with the release of Android 4.1, Jelly Bean, Google has upped the ante on security. Here’s what Google had to say about their ever-increasing emphasis on security:

Android 1.5+

  • ProPolice to prevent stack buffer overruns (-fstack-protector)
  • safe_iop to reduce integer overflows
  • Extensions to OpenBSD dlmalloc to prevent double free() vulnerabilities and to prevent chunk consolidation attacks. Chunk consolidation attacks are a common way to exploit heap corruption.
  • OpenBSD calloc to prevent integer overflows during memory allocation

Android 2.3+

  • Format string vulnerability protections (-Wformat-security -Werror=format-security)
  • Hardware-based No eXecute (NX) to prevent code execution on the stack and heap
  • Linux mmap_min_addr to mitigate null pointer dereference privilege escalation (further enhanced in Android 4.1)

Android 4.0+

  • Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) to randomize key locations in memory

Android 4.1+

  • PIE (Position Independent Executable) support
  • Read-only relocations / immediate binding (-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now)
  • dmesg_restrict enabled (avoid leaking kernel addresses)
  • kptr_restrict enabled (avoid leaking kernel addresses)

According to Oberheide, in his most recent analysis of the security of Android 4.1 and the above implementations Google has made:

While Android is still playing a bit of catch-up, other mobile platforms are moving ahead with more innovative exploit mitigation techniques, such as the in-kernel ASLR present in Apple’s iOS 6. One could claim that iOS is being proactive with such techniques, but in reality, they’re simply being reactive to the type of exploits that typically target the iOS platform. However, Apple does deserve credit for raising the barrier up to the point of kernel exploitation by employing effective userspace mitigations such NX, ASLR, and mandatory code signing. Thankfully, Android is getting there, and Jelly Bean is a major step towards that goal.

It would seem that Google continues to move forward with their embrace of higher security for Android, but let us hope that their increased security does not come at the cost of reduced control and access for the development community, which in large part has contributed to the success of Android.

To read more about ASLR and mobile security check out Oberheide’s article.


_________
Want something on the XDA Portal? Send us a tip!
TAGS:

jerdog

jerdog is an editor on XDA-Developers, the largest community for Android users. Jeremy has been an XDA member since 2007, and has been involved in technology in one way or another, dating back to when he was 8 years old and was given his first PC in 1984 - which promptly got formatted. It was a match made in the stars, and he never looked back. He has owned, to date, over 60 mobile devices over the last 15 years and mobile technology just clicks with him. In addition to being a News Editor and OEM Relations Manager, he is a Senior Moderator and member of the Developer and Moderator Committees at XDA.
Mario Tomás Serrafero · Mar 27, 2015 at 04:13 pm · 2 comments

Should You Get Wear? Wearer’s Practical Observations

Wear is said to not offer enough for mass adoption, even though its been in the market for over 9 months. I personally have a Gear Live which I purchased 8 months ago, and my experience with it has had its ups and downs throughout my time with it. For the longest time, I was not able to recommend the platform to anyone. Since then, a lot of updates have hit Wear watches, some improving battery life, others changing the...

XDA NEWS
GermainZ · Mar 27, 2015 at 01:15 pm · 2 comments

SlimRoms: Updates on the Horizon

SlimRoms' website has been experiencing technical difficulties for the last month or so, but it's good to know the team is working hard and is still on top of things. The SlimRoms GitHub repos are getting updated with some major changes showing up. Most notably, some projects are getting a new 5.1 branch: lp5.1! A new, revamped and open source website is also in the works, with a look inspired by material design. We also got a tip about an...

XDA NEWS
Emil Kako · Mar 27, 2015 at 12:47 pm · 2 comments

Your Favorite Wireless Charger?

Wireless charging is becoming more and more common as many OEMs are now starting to include this feature in their flagships. There are already dozens of wireless chargers to choose from on the market today, but quality definitely varies. For those of you who charge your devices wirelessly, let us know which charger is your favorite and why.

DISCUSS
Share This