Wear is said to not offer enough for mass adoption, even though its been in the market for over 9 months. I personally have a Gear Live which I purchased 8 months ago, and my experience with it has had its ups and downs throughout my time with it. For the longest time, I was not able to recommend the platform to anyone. Since then, a lot of updates have hit Wear watches, some improving battery life, others changing the...
Just How “Open” is Android Wear?
To say that Android Wear has been on everyone’s mind ever since its unveiling would be a bit of an understatement. While we’re still several months away from being able to purchase Wear-powered devices, we can already install the emulator on our PCs, root it, and even attempt to port the software to other smartwatches such as the original Galaxy Gear and Moto Actv thanks to an emulator system dump.
While much is already know about how Wear will work from an end-user perspective, remarkably little is known about Wear from a developer perspective. Yes, we all know that Wear is built atop AOSP code—and because of this, it will be compatible with a large percentage of standard Android apps with little to no modification. However, what we don’t yet know is how open (or closed) Wear will be.
It’s no secret that in Android’s latest iterations, Google has not-so-slowly been replacing various open source AOSP components with their closed-source counterparts—just take a look at Hangouts, Chrome Browser, and if you own a Nexus or GPe device, the Google Experience Launcher. How will this play out with Android Wear? Unfortunately, nobody (other than Google) knows.
Since Android Wear is built atop the same Android underpinnings as Android OS proper, a large portion of its code is already in the AOSP. But what about the Wear-specific Google-provided apps like the wearable-friendly launcher and the rest of its platform-specific apps? Judging from current trends, it’s quite possible that Google will want to keep these pieces closed source. This would afford Google a greater degree of control over the platform, though it could also limit the types of devices that Wear can power.
Yes, IMO a VERY important question that hasn’t been answered yet.
I would be concerned that Google felt it was TOO open with Android proper and tried to restrict Wear even more.
If the current preview emulator is a good indication, then Wear is just another variant of Android. Many normal apps can run on it right now, though with issues. I tested my own app and it more or less worked, with a squished UI.
So I think a LOT of the Wear code is effectively already IN AOSP already.
But will Google release enough Wear specific code for custom ROMs to be built ? I very much hope so.
So how “open” is Android Wear? Is it worth it for Google to sacrifice some degree of openness in order to retain greater control of the platform? Will it be open enough to allow aftermarket ROM developers to port Wear over to current generation smartwatches? Leave us your thoughts in the comments below, and don’t forget to head over to the original thread in our Android Wear forums to continue the discussion!
Want something on the XDA Portal? Send us a tip!
SlimRoms' website has been experiencing technical difficulties for the last month or so, but it's good to know the team is working hard and is still on top of things. The SlimRoms GitHub repos are getting updated with some major changes showing up. Most notably, some projects are getting a new 5.1 branch: lp5.1! A new, revamped and open source website is also in the works, with a look inspired by material design. We also got a tip about an...
Wireless charging is becoming more and more common as many OEMs are now starting to include this feature in their flagships. There are already dozens of wireless chargers to choose from on the market today, but quality definitely varies. For those of you who charge your devices wirelessly, let us know which charger is your favorite and why.