Adam Outler · Jun 1, 2012 at 09:00 am

Oracle vs Google: Final Decisions

Judge Alsup has ruled that Oracle’s Java APIs are not copyrightable, and in doing so, developers everywhere let out a sigh of relief. Oracle has engaged Google in a legal battle over Android’s use of JAVA language for quite some time. Now, Judge Alsup made his final decision regarding the case regarding the Java Application Protocol Interface.

The overall name tree, of course, has creative elements but it is also a precise command structure — a utilitarian and functional set of symbols, each to carry out a pre-assigned function. This command structure is a system or method of operation under Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act and, therefore, cannot be copyrighted. Duplication of the command structure is necessary for interoperability…

Copyright Act 17 USC Section 102, paragraph b:

(b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.

Oracle will likely appeal on grounds that its command structure is a work of art that stands on it’s own. However, those of us who are familiar with Java will say otherwise. Java is an extremely straight forword programming language, which is intended to read close to natural language. The entire language was optimized for natural language expression. For example, if you want to create a File reference called myFile to a File on your computer called C:\readme, you would write: File myFile = new File(“C:\readme”); .

Had Java’s programmers decided that they wanted to obfuscate the language more and make the structures less like natural langauge, they may have stood a chance of calling the langauge a work of art. However, Java is simple, to-the-point, and is designed to be useful rather than attractive. Each word in Java would be representative of a Noun, Verb or adjective in English. The same features that make it easy to learn and use are what makes it “utilitarian.”

If Judge Alsup had ruled that Oracle could copyright their API, every API since the creation of computers would come under scrutiny! Any application that communicated with another application could be prosecuted using the Oracle versus Google case as a precedent. Any developer who makes a plugin that interfaces with another program out-of-license could have faced legal action.

This ruling marks the end of the Oracle versus Google case. Oracle’s legal team may have earned enough to pay off their lawyers. The ruling is fair, but we can expect this will not be the last we see of Oracle, as they will surely attempt an appeal. For today, we should all take a minute to realize that this case establishes a base of free expression of language through programming.

Sources: Groklaw (2), 17 USC 102 via Cornell.edu


_________
Want something on the XDA Portal? Send us a tip!
TAGS:
Jimmy McGee · Feb 27, 2015 at 06:00 am · no comments

MWC Announcements, FCC Rules on Net Neutrality – XDA TV

The FCC has ruled on Net Neutrality! That and much more news is covered by Jordan when he reviews all the important stories from this week. Included in this week's news is the announcement of the Pebble Time Kickstarter and be sure to stay tuned for even more mobile world congress announcements! That's not all that's covered in today's video! Jordan talks about the other videos released this week on XDA TV. XDA TV Producer TK released an Xposed Tuesday...

XDA NEWS
Emil Kako · Feb 26, 2015 at 12:30 pm · 1 comment

What Bugs You Most About Google’s Play Store?

Google announced today that it will be bringing ads to the Play Store, and while that will surely annoy the majority of us, it isn't the only thing that sucks about the Play Store. From the lack of clear communication with developers to ridiculous restrictions, there are a handful of very annoying things about Google's approach. Let us know what bugs you the most about the Play Store.

DISCUSS
Mario Tomás Serrafero · Feb 26, 2015 at 11:32 am · 1 comment

Watches: Luxurious Frivolity vs. Humble Practicality

Smartwatches still have a lot of growing up to do. Not too long ago the latest Canalys figures revealed a rather disappointing outcome for 2014, something we covered with the ultimate conclusion that, once again, smartwatches had no year. The direction of smartwatches is unclear to even the biggest OEMs, and with every new option there seems to be polarizing dissonances from what people and OEMs want and what they both think they want. We've documented many of the reasons as to...

XDA NEWS
Share This