Join us in a fun Sunday Debate on New vs. Old. Come with your opinions and feel free to read some of our thoughts, then pick your side or play devil’s advocate to get your voice heard and engage in friendly discussion. You can read our food-for-thought or jump straight into the fray below! Smartphone purchases make for some of the sweetest times of the year for many of us. After all, we are hobbyists of Android and a new...
The Galaxy S III S5E4412 Processor—A Hacker’s Overview
The Exynos 4412 processor, aka S5E4412, has been confirmed as the application processor for the Samsung Galaxy S III. After scouring the web for publicly available data sheets, best information listing I could come up with came from 8gpad. I’d like to take a minute and talk about the S5E4412 procssor.
Lets start by breaking down the model number. S5= Samsung 5th generation processor. E is an unknown, however this has traditionally stood for the packging type (PoP or BGA). 44 = Exynos 4th generation and 4 cores. The 12 is unknown to me at this time, however I do believe it deals with the video capabilities and/or revision. Please correct me in the comments below.
This Quad-Core CORTEX A9 processor supports NEON extensions as expected. Unexpectedly though, while it is a 32 bit processor, this bad mama-jamma supports up to 128bits internally, which is double that of the previous Exynos models.
For those of you “connected” individuals, you should be happy to know that the processor natively supports USB-OTG, USB-Host, and USB-Device modes. Lets all just hope that Samsung does not let us down and forget to connect a 5V line to the USB driver chip. The processor also supports up to 4 SD Cards. For those interested in communicating directly with the processor, this processor supports Samsung’s CORESIGHT debugger at 200 MHz and 1v. 4 UART ports, 8 i2c ports and 3 SPI ports. It also has 64KB of IROM memory that is used to initialize the processor itself.
Personally, I think it’s time that Samsung took a hard look at their configuration issues. Given the hardware above, the features of the device could greatly be expanded with only a small change to their standard operating procedures seen previously. I’d like to see some changes to the boot sequence. More specifically, in that 64KB of IROM memory, there is a set of instructions which lets the device boot directly from USB. This needs to be accessible somehow for those emergencies we at XDA-Developers have every day. Why this is kept locked down, I will never understand. The device should be easily revived in case of emergency, and its well within the capabilities of the device. xOM5 modification please.
Here’s hoping Samsung uses their own hardware the way it’s designed to be used!
Want something on the XDA Portal? Send us a tip!
Android and openness is something we talk about all the time, but the recent developments in the industry point towards inherent flaws with this very premise. Be it from bloggers, political institutions or corporations, Android is seemingly not open enough. The “War on Openness” is ironically becoming an open war, where many players are increasing their stakes and scope to try and land a bigger hold - or at the very least, restrict Google’s - on what is the world’s...
Smartphone cameras have advanced so tremendously over the past few years that they have almost completely replaced point and shoot digital cameras for the most of us. Furthermore, since our smartphones are always with us, the majority of us end up taking tons of photos throughout the lifespan of our devices. But what happens to all the old photos you take? Do you store them on an external hard-drive or keep them backed up to an online cloud service like Flickr? Let us know what your favorite way of storing old photos is and why.